|
FIRE
SIGNATURE PREDICTION OR FIRE MODELING
The
Wildland Fire Signature Prediction Method is an experts model
for predicting wildland fire behavior. The method employs the principle
of Occams Razor; the model with the least assumptions
is the best model.
The
assumptions made in other models are many whereas the Campbell Prediction
System, (C.P.S.) are few. The Signature model is focused on when
and where the fire behavior will change that is to become worse
or easer. The method uses observations of the fire at the head,
flanks and heel, determining the cause of the variations in intensity,
and identifies where these variations will replicate on the fireground.
The goal of the method is to identify where the fire can be successfully
contained. This is called The Threshold of Control.
The
next phase is to determine the tactics and the resource requirements
needed to accomplish the task. The information is transmitted with
phrases contained in the CPS text and or a map showing the potential
trigger points of change, tracks the fire could take and where the
fire will fall within the threshold of control. The strategy that
assures proper use of this model is; Fight the fire when and where
there is a good chance of success and do not send resources where
the effort will fail.
Occams
Razor
Occam's
razor is especially important for universal models such as the ones
developed in General Systems Theory, mathematics or philosophy,
because there the subject domain is of an unlimited complexity.
If one starts with too complicated foundations for a theory that
potentially encompasses the universe, the chances of getting any
manageable model are very slim indeed. Moreover, the principle is
sometimes the only remaining guideline when entering domains of
such a high level of abstraction that no concrete tests or observations
can decide between rival models. In mathematical modelling of systems,
the principle can be made more concrete in the form of the principle
of uncertainty maximization: from your data, induce that model which
minimizes the number of additional assumptions.
Doug
Campbell
9/7/2000
|