|
Common
Tactical Errors on the Fireground
By Doug Campbell
Fire
behavior prediction is the first line of defense.
When things go wrong and firefighters are burned by the fire they
are engaged in fighting, it is usually because they have failed
to predict a fire behavior change. Fire behavior changes because
the forces of wind, slope or preheating of the fuel change in their
aggregate alignment or strength. When
these forces of change come into alignment the fire potential is
great. When they go out of alignment the fire potential is reduced.
The observations made on the fire should reveal the fire signature.
This signature (degree of variation) is important information to
use in making predictions. Observations of the fire and the fire
ground can be used to make fire behavior predictions of it getting
worse or easier. In the following examples the common errors will
be described in CPS phrases.
Loop Fire 1966
Thirteen El Cariso Hotshots were killed and others injured when
a cold trail fireline was being constructed downhill at 1555 on a
SW aspect. The fire relocated from the bottom of a draw to the slope
below the crew and the smoldering fire transitioned to an area on
fire creating flame lengths reaching 100 feet. The fire ran over a
ridge a few yards beyond the accident site, went out of alignment
and quit.
- Situation:
The ground between the fire and the crew was in alignment. Wind,
slope and solar preheating were aligned.
- Error:
The officers and firefighters did not recognize the potential
getting worse. The tactic needed a time tag.
Romero
Fire 1971
Four firefighters were killed when fire overran their position
as they tried to gain a safety area.
- Situation:
The fire was a topography fire all day and tractors cut indirect
line in a canyon below. The forecast was for possible Sundowners
to occur somewhere on the coast. The tractors were working their
way out from under the open fire line when the wind surfaced and
changed the fire into a downhill wind driven fire.
- Error:
Not changing the tactics before the Sundowner event occurred.
Battlement
Creek 1976
Three were killed and another severely burned during a burnout
operation. The accident happened on a ridge top. Their burnout was
aligned against the forces of slope, wind and preheat and was not
burning well. Another burnout team lit fire below, placing their fire
in full alignment with wind, slope and solar preheating of the fuel
that promoted maximum fire spread. The burnout from the bottom of
the slope hit the ridge with such intensity that flames swept over
the crew's position forcing them into shelters.
-
Situation: The ground between the fire and the crew was in alignment.
Wind, slope and solar preheat were aligned.
- Error:
The officers and firefighters did not recognize the potential
getting worse. There was no time tag on the tactic.
Spanish
Ranch 1979
Four firefighters died as a result of a fire that overran them
while they were using an escape route.
-
Situation: An indirect tractor line was placed on a ridgetop in
front of a running wildfire. The time was 1615 and the aspect
between them and the fire was West with the wind from the West.
This aligned wind and slope and solar preheating.
- Error:
Failure to recognize the potential impact of the extreme fire
behavior below their position. Using the route to their position
as the escape route instead of running to a location where the
fire would come at them "out of alignment."
The
Butte Fire 1985
Seventy-two firefighters deployed shelters when the Butte fire
ran up a west aspect with a following wind at 1600 hours. The crews
were told to burn out from the ridge top in tall timber if the fire
made a run toward them. The tree crowns were the major source of fuel
that created 200-foot flames. The planners and crew supervisors apparently
did not know they could not burn out the crowns from the shaded side
of the tree, into the wind and downslope. They tried the burnout tactic
but the fire did not burn any crowns it just cooked them making the
fire behavior next to the fireline worse. A video was made showing
how well the fire shelters worked.
-
Situation: The ground between the fire and the crew was in alignment.
Wind, slope and solar preheating were aligned.
- Errors:
The officers and firefighters did not recognize the fire¹s
signature. The fire had made large hot runs two days before and
established its signature which was largely ignored. The
tactic was not time tagged.
Yellowstone
fires 1988
Failure to use "fuels fire" tactics because of environmental
concerns and policies of the National Park made control of these fires
impossible. The fires burned until snow quenched them. These fires
were fuels fires that would require a massive indirect and burnout
tactic, a tactic which was unacceptable to the administration. The
monies spent on failed tactical solutions were in the billions. Much
of the control efforts were predictably wasted. This was a failure
to understand wildland fire behavior and our understanding the thresholds
of control. Fight fire when you can prevail.
- Situation:
Fire approaching the lodge was predicted to be within the threshold
of control and the parking lot a safe area.
- Error:
The fire's signature was not fully appreciated and many of the
firefighters evacuated the area when operations radioed, "everybody
out."
Glen
Alen 1993
Two firefighters killed and two more badly burned while they
were in a position above the fire with a slope in full alignment between
them and the fire. The fire flared up below the crew and flashed over
them before they could reach a safe position. The time was 1615 hours
and located on a SW aspect with a SW wind.
- Situation:
The fire was located on a SW aspect at the peak of the fuel flammability
curve with slope and wind favoring the fire.
- Error:
The firefighters did not recognize that their position was a dangerous
one.
Buchannan
Rx burn 1993
One firefighter was killed and 15 more endangered when firing
was done below their position while they were on a contour road near
a ridgetop. The aerial firing of a SW aspect at it's peak heating
period got the Pinion/Juniper fuel to carry fire. The amount and arrangement
of fire in the hot and dry fuel bed caused extreme fire behavior.
A vertical cliff on a West aspect was at maximum heat and created
some up drafts that were deemed un-predictable and causative in the
accident report.
- Situation:
Alignment of forces below the crew made the situation unsafe.
- Error:
Firefighters failed to recognize the fire behavior potential and
time tag the operation.
South
Canyon Fire 1994
Fourteen firefighters perished in a burnover in the afternoon
on a SW aspect.
- Situation:
They were in poor position when the peak of spectral heating was
present; the crowns of the underburned oak brush had been dried,
being heated from above by the sun and below by ground fire and
were highly flammable. In addition a cold front passed over the
area and the wind speed increased.
- Error:
Failure to recognize the potential for extreme fire behavior occurring
below and over their position even after observing 100 foot flames
in a similar alignment minutes before the fatal fire run.
Green
Meadow 1994
A burnover of an engine crew was captured on videotape. At about
1300 hours the intensity went to area on fire and almost killed the
crew.
- Situation:
The crew was positioned between the fire and the structure. The
fire ground between was in full alignment with wind, slope and
preheat. The fire was burning with high intensity down hill and
toward a location below the firefighters where it would gain improved
alignment.
- Error:
Failure to recognize the potential impact of the extreme fire
behavior below their position. Failure to time tag the tactic.
On the good side, three major runs were predicted and tactics
devised that prevented accidents from occurring. CPS was the major
predictive tool used by the FBA.
Grand
Fire 1996
The Grand fire was one where good tactics were used and bad tactics
avoided by using CPS language. Fire went out of alignment at the top
of the ridge, no line needed. I.R. was used to verify that the edge
of fire was cold. Hotshots wanted to put the crew on a steep hot slope
and perform cold trail work. The OPS said no and gave his reasons.
If the fire burned out that area, it would go over the ridge and most
likely go out on the backside, like the fire had done the day before.
The crew would be in a bad position if the fire rekindled, a similar
situation to the Loop fire of 1966. CPS language was used to prevent
crews being put into dangerous positions. Fight fire when it is out
of alignment.
Calabasas
Fire 1996
This was an interface fire in the Malibu area of Southern California.
Ten firefighters were burned over injuring all ten, one of them critically.
- Situation:
The crew was above a slope that was in full alignment positioned
for structure protection when the fire relocated to the bottom
of the slope and spotted, creating an area on fire that produced
extreme flame lengths.
- Error:
Failure to recognize the potential impact of the extreme fire
behavior below their position. Did not recognize the implications
of the wind change that was predicted and observed. Did not recognize
the implications of the two previous runs near their position.
Conclusions:
When
wind, slope and solar preheat forces go into alignment, the fire
makes runs. If firefighters learn to see this condition setting
up they can avoid being in the path of the fire. When they fail
to recognize the potential their evacuation is implemented too late
to avoid becoming over-run by fire. Firefighters need to learn to
act on the potential rather than waiting for the fire to make the
first move. The timing and the position of the fire and firefighters
are critical elements and must be well managed as part of the tactical
approach. When firefighters are positioned in front of a fire that
is coming into alignment they are making a common mistake as did
the victims of the Green Meadow, the Loop, the Mann Gulch, the Glen
Alen, the Butte, the Spanish Ranch, The Buchannan and South Canyon
fire burnovers.
|